Artificial intelligence subjectivity in the implementation of public administration: the cybernetic aspect

This paper examines the phenomenon of artificial intelligence subjectivity along with its cybernetic aspects. It explores various approaches to understanding and defining AI, starting with analyses of how the behavior of intelligent systems corresponds to human behavior patterns and extending to questions regarding the rationality of these systems’ actions. The works of N. Wiener, the founder of cybernetics, play a crucial role, as he established fundamental analogies between the functioning of living organisms and computational machines. These analogies are essential for understanding the nature of AI and its potential capabilities. The authors of this paper give particular attention to the functioning of AI and to discussions of its ability for self-learning and selfreproduction. The paper highlights AI's potential for self-development and adaptation to diverse conditions — these two features make it a key tool in modern technological innovation. It also analyzes the philosophical and sociological concept of AI subjectivity, suggesting that such systems may possess intelligence that significantly surpasses human cognitive abilities, along with the capacity for autonomous learning and expansion. Building on Wiener’s ideas, humanity must determine the nature of interaction between humans and machines (including AI) and organize the distribution of functions between them optimally. The authors conclude that the effectiveness of public administration can be enhanced through a comprehensive approach to implementing new information and technological solutions. It is about using neural networks and AI systems, providing qualified specialists and legal regulatory mechanisms for public authorities, and considering sociocultural and psycho-emotional factors, along with technical equipment and methods of logical-semantic interpretation.

1. Andriyanov, A. M., Barbakov, O. M., & Ivanova, S. I. (2025). Artificial intelligence systems in law enforcement management. Proceedings оf Higher Educational Institutions. Sociology. Economics. Politics, 18(1), pp. 7-17. (In Russian).DOI: 10.31660/1993-1824-2025-1-7-17.

2. Russell, S. J. & Norvig, P. (1995). Artificial intelligence: a modern approach, 4 global edition. Pearson Education Prentice hall. (In English).

3. O razvitii iskusstvennogo intellekta v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: ukaz Prezidenta Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 10 oktyabrya 2019 g. № 490. Moscow, 2019. (In Russian). Аvailabl at: http://www.kremlin.ru/acts/bank/44731.

4. Bryantseva, O. V. & Bryantsev, I. I. (2023). Artificial intelligence subjectivity issue in the system of public relations. The bulletin of the Volga region institute of administration, 23(3), рр. 37-50. (In Russian). DOI: 10.22394/1682-2358-2023-3-37-50

5. Viner, N. (1958). Kibernetika i obshchestvo. Moscow, Inostrannaya literature Publ., 168 p. (In Russian).

6. Evangelie ot Matfeya. Glava 5, st. 37. (In Russian). Аvailable at: https://www.pravoslavnaya-biblioteka.ru/bibliya/noviy-zavet/evangelie-ot-matfeya. html#5

7. Viner, N. (1966). Tvorets i robot. Moscow, Progress Publ., 112 p. (In Russian).

8. Bibliya. Kniga Bytiya. Gl. 2, st. 7. (In Russian). Аvailable at: https://azbyka.ru/ biblia/?Gen.2&r

9. Koran. Sura 32, ayat 6–7. (In Russian). Аvailable at: https://umma.ru/sura-32-assadzhda-zemnoj-poklon

10. Shkola vyzhivaniya. (2016). (In Russian). Аvailable at: https://t-i.ru/articles/17561

11. Chelovek byl sotvoren iz gliny? (In Russian). Аvailable at: https://pikabu.ru/story/chelovek_byil_sotvoren_iz_glinyi_10669611

12. Nabor tekhnologiy iskusstvennogo intellekta Golem.AI. (In Russian). Аvailable at: https://www.aitechsuite.com/tools/golem.ai

13. Viner, N. (1968). Kibernetika ili upravlenie i svyaz' v zhivotnom i mashine. Moscow, Sovetskoe radio, Publ., 328 p. (In Russian).

14. Evangelie ot Luki. Gl. 20, st. 25. (In Russian). Аvailable at: https://azbyka.ru/biblia/?Lk.20:25

15. Ponomareva, E. V. (2023). Legal personality of artificial intelligence: legal theoretical analysis. Bulletin of liberal arts university, 4(43), рр.17-31. (In Russian). DOI: 10.35853/vestnik.gu.2023.4(43).02.

16. Bryancev, I. I. & Bryanceva, O. V. (2020). Legal and technological aspects of "national" features of artificial intelligence. Law and business: legal space for business development in Russia. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., (4), pp. 88-95. (In Russian).

17. Arkhipov, V. V., & Naumov, V. B. (2017). Artificial intelligence and autonomous devices in legal context: on development of the first Russian law on robotics. Spiiras Proceedings, 6(55), pp. 46-62. (In Russian). DOI: 10.15622/sp.55.2.