Methods of motivation of students to learn (based on the materials of an expert survey)

This article examines traditional and innovative teaching methods that can enhance the university students’ cognitive activity. To achieve this aim, the author uses informal interviews with faculty. The study examines expert educational practices aimed at increasing students’ motivation to learn. Researcher focuses on contemporary methods that faculty uses most often in their daily teaching practice. The results of the study identify the most effective teaching methods in lectures and seminars. The article concludes that both traditional and innovative methods can increase students’ motivation to learn, improve the quality of higher education, and support students in adapting to the educational environment.

1. Rosenberg N. V., Rozhkova L. V. Internet in the Lives of Russian Youth. University proceedings. Volga Region. Social Sciences. 2023;3(67):5–19. (In Russ.). http://doi.org/10.21685/2072-3016-2023-3-1

2. Bogdan N. V., Borodina E. S. The structure of learning motives of freshmen in tertiary education. Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Ser. Education. Educational Sciences. 2021;3(3):59–70. (In Russ.). http://doi.org/10.14529/ped210305

3. Tsyrenova V. B., Lumbunova N. B. Managing Students' learning Motivation in the Digitalization Context of Tomsk State University journal. 2021;(470):203–209. (In Russ.). http://doi.org/10.17223/15617793/470/24

4. Fedulova K. A., Guzanov B. N., Kotova I. A. Development of professional motivation of students in the process of specially organized research work. Contemporary higher education: innovative aspects. 2024;16(1-63):89–100.

5. Kaitov A. P. Theoretical aspects of the problem of educational motivation development among students of higher education in foreign studies. Tambov University Review. Series: Humanities. 2023;28(1):24–38. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.20310/1810-0201-2023-28-1-24-38

6. Borzova T. A. Motivation of students to study in a modern university. Mir nauki, kultury, obrazovaniya. 2023;5(102):11–13. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24412/1991-5497-2023-5102-11-13

7. Milovanova G. V., Kulyashova N. M., Shemyakina E. Yu. Comparative Analysis of Motivational Characteristics of Students at Different Stages of Study. Scientific and Methodological Electronic Journal "Concept". 2022;(6):46–57. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24412/2304-120X-2022-11043

8. Lebedeva E. I. Educational motivation of university students with different levels of self-esteem and aspirations. Pushkin Leningrad state university journal. 2022;(4):297–311. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.35231/18186653_2022_4_297

9. Chernyak T. V. Motivation for Learning as a Factor in the Professional Development of Future Specialists-to-be. The Siberian Transport University A scientific journal Bulletin: Humanitarian research. 2022;1(12):40–47. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.52170/2618-7949_2022_12_40

10. Sidorova N. V., Yakubova A. A. Professional Motivation of Student Youth: Empirical Research Experience. Society: Sociology, Psychology, Pedagogics. 2022;(12):92–96. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24158/spp.2022.12.14

11. Krylova M. A. The specifics of motivation of deviant behavior of students in the educational process. Russian academic journal «Telescope: journal of sociological and marketing research».2022;1(5):81–86. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24412/1994-3776-2022-1-81-86

12. Minina Yu. I., Malysheva O. V. Incentive management of student learning. Bulletin of the Samara Municipal Institute of Management. 2024;(2):71–81. (In Russ.).

13. Filatova T. A., Koltsa E. E. Challenges and Innovations in Modern Pedagogy. International Journal of Humanities and Natural Sciences. 2023;12-5(87):11–14. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24412/2500-1000-2023-12-5-11-14

14. Rosenberg N. V., Afanasyeva Yu. L., Rudakova I. A. A social image of modern student youth: value aspects (by the materials of sociological research results). University proceedings. Volga Region. Social Sciences. 2025;1(73):24–41. (In Russ.).https://doi.org/10.21685/2072-3016-2025-1-3

15. Tarasov S. V., Spasskaya E. B., Proekt Yu. L. The Image of the University Instructor as a Factor in Students’Assessment of the Educational Environment and Academic Motivation. Higher Education in Russia. 2025;34(7):52–73. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2025-34-7-52-73

16. Strauss A., Corbin J. Fundamentals of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory, Procedures, and Techniques. Moscow: Editorial URSS, 2001. (In Russ.).

17. Zubova L. V., Gamova N. A., Girina A. N. Formation of motivation of professional activity of students of economic directions of the university. Bulletin of the Orenburg State University. 2020;4(227):26–32. https://doi.org/10.25198/1814-6457-227-26

18. Elagina V. S. Project training technology as a means of assessment educational results of students. Pedagogy: history, prospects. 2021;4(5):12–20. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17748/2686–9969–2021–4-5-12-20

19. Vorontsova T. V., Borisko S. N., Rykova B. V. Innovative potential of university project-based activity. Pedagogical Research. 2022;(3):58–74. (In Russ.).

20. Puzyanova Zh. V., Kostrikin E. G. Рroject-based approach in teaching: university practice. Bulletin of Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. Series: Sociology. 2025;25(3):652–664. (In Russ.). http://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2272-2025-25-3-652-664

21. Shchuplenkov O. V., Shchuplenkov N. O. Organization of project activities at the university in the system of scientific reflection. Vestnik of Minin University. 2024;12(2):5. (In Russ.). http://doi.org/10.26795/2307-1281-2024-12-2-5.